Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory17.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 18 '23 at 21:39
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
45.6% Average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 78.2
2-Core 150
51% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 228
8-Core 362
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 369
23% 369 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 11 Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.4.3
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.7
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 22.6
11% 16.3 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 19.8
Splatting 13.6
11% 13.1 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-480-G3 480GB
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 12 2.1 14 2.3 15 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 36% Great: 95%
Initio 3639S 1TB
609GB free
Firmware: 0957
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 35 37 36 37 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
13.8% Very poor
Read 11.2
Write 26
Mixed 25.1
SusWrite 35.6
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.6
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.7
233% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR3200D464L22/16G Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 24GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
62.4% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 24.2
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 11 162 59 60 21.5" 1280 720 LEN61A9 LEN T22i-10
Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,982 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $425
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback