Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 20156

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20156  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Emerald Lake 2
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120613
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 22 '22 at 16:51
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 86
1-Core 79.2
2-Core 123
61% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 189
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3977) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.04% Terrible
Lighting 3.8
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 2.7
3% 3.43 fps
MRender 3.5
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.43 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
FOXIN 128GB
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R3G30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 338 366 107 91 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 347
Write 384
Mixed 314
SusWrite 216
71% 315 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 24.6
80% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 88.9
DQ Write 301
DQ Mixed 129
118% 173 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 79%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$32
251GB free
Firmware: 0011LVM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 63 61 61 62 62 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
34.9% Below average
Read 60
Write 55.5
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 61.6
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
31.6% Below average
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 9.2
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20156 Builds (Compare 139 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20156

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 39% - Below average Total price: $122
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback