Today's hottest deals

Koloe X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel Thurley
MotherboardKoloe X58  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 30 '22 at 09:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 90%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 87
1-Core 88.1
2-Core 133
64% 103 Pts
4-Core 240
8-Core 367
38% 303 Pts
64-Core 399
25% 399 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4300
Sapphire(174B 0E13) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.73 fps
MRender 1.2
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.03 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LN128HAHQ-000L2 128GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT04L0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 129 132 133 133 136 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.6% Average
Read 179
Write 218
Mixed 124
SusWrite 132
37% 163 MB/s
4K Read 11.1
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 19
62% 23.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 124
96% 132 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MXIC 25L8005 49GB
4266, 33 MHz
16384, 33792 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 12.6
MC Write 12
MC Mixed 10.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.6
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X58 Builds (Compare 517 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Koloe X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback