Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory59.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '17 at 20:50
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
68.7% Good
Memory 68.6
1-Core 109
2-Core 213
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 775
67% 572 Pts
64-Core 2,438
151% 2,438 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 139
Reflection 145
Parallax 126
113% 136 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 131
Splatting 106
95% 117 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 8.2
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 538
Write 403
Mixed 372
97% 437 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 21
94% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 36.7
91% 190 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 448%
Amd-raid SAMSUNG MZ7WD480 480GB
255GB free
Firmware: NS00
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
79.8% Very good
Read 491
Write 351
Mixed 395
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 26
87% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 98.9
119% 209 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 80%
Amd-raid SanDisk SII 480GB
115GB free
Firmware: X312
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 444
Write 327
Mixed 248
75% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 39.8
4K Mixed 12.6
74% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 313
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 28.6
85% 186 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%
Asmt 2115 128GB
16GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.9% Below average
Read 243
Write 153
Mixed 194
44% 196 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 21.8
4K Mixed 12.6
49% 16.1 MB/s
DQ Read 87.4
DQ Write 49.1
DQ Mixed 27.9
32% 54.8 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 63%
WD My Passport 2TB
1TB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 83.3
Write 90.7
Mixed 76.6
108% 83.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.89
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
168% Outstanding
MC Read 61.7
MC Write 73.5
MC Mixed 66.3
192% 67.2 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 40.2
SC Mixed 28.1
83% 29.1 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 168%
Great: 137%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 242 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 120%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 AORUS Gaming 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $988
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback