| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 27.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 32.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20201208 |
| Uptime | 3 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 18 '22 at 20:34 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 26% |
PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.7%
Good
|
66% 118 Pts
|
53% 438 Pts
|
42% 675 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 517.48
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.4%
Poor
|
28% 36.1 fps
|
26% 32.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$28
33GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 165 74 46 4.7 6.8 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
52% 236 MB/s
|
35% 9.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate ST3250310AS 250GB-$44
318GB free
Firmware: 3.AAB
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 76 78 76 81 MB/s
|
39.7%
Below average
|
41% 56.1 MB/s
|
123% 0.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown BL8G30C15U4RL.M8FE1 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
62.7%
Good
|
64% 22.4 GB/s
|
57% 20.1 GB/s
|
35% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,854 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 533x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 479x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $83Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 386x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 312x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 227x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $143Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 222x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $305 |