Today's hottest deals

Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220321
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 22 '22 at 10:22
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 51
1-Core 108
2-Core 202
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 455
52% 406 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.50.02.03
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 18.7
Reflection 26.1
Parallax 33.8
15% 26.2 fps
MRender 23
Gravity 20.1
Splatting 27.2
20% 23.4 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Phison ESMP512GKB4C3-E13TS 512GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM00.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 224 231 226 236 298 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 682
Write 221
Mixed 260
SusWrite 239
77% 351 MB/s
4K Read 21.4
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 24
97% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 278
217% 302 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.4% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 23.4
MC Mixed 28.1
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 23.3
SC Mixed 20.9
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 157
26% 157 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback