Acer Predator PH717-71

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive127% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Predator PH717-71  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Levante_CFS
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 29 '22 at 14:58
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 46%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 78
1-Core 76.2
2-Core 166
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 298
8-Core 390
44% 344 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 66%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Acer(1025 133B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 40
Reflection 40
Parallax 57.2
33% 45.7 fps
MRender 18.2
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 61.9
41% 47.6 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme WDC PC SN720 SDA 256GB
160GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 10121000 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 418 431 380 377 389 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,149
Write 1,432
Mixed 1,221
SusWrite 399
236% 1,050 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 60.5
4K Mixed 36.1
117% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 508
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 447
338% 455 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 127%
Great: 191%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
404GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1824 931 799 792 801 798 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1905
Write 1,644
Mixed 1,482
SusWrite 991
337% 1,505 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 64.7
4K Mixed 46.5
152% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 442
DQ Mixed 469
357% 483 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 206%
Great: 346%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
839GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 134 136 132 140 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 108
Write 147
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 138
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.7
192% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 029E CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 029E CMSX16GX4M2A2666C18 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
70% Very good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 26.5
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH717-71 Builds (Compare 102 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Acer Predator PH717-71

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback