Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive92.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140812
Uptime12.2 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 21:52
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4150-$30
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 162
71% 117 Pts
4-Core 246
8-Core 250
33% 248 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 88 89 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
92.1% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 452
Mixed 390
SusWrite 124
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 79.7
4K Mixed 47.9
160% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 352
264% 352 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.1%
Great: 115%
Samsung 860 Pro 256GB-$90
101GB free
Firmware: RVM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 468 466 462 456 463 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 449
Mixed 411
SusWrite 459
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 47.3
160% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 113%
Great: 131%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$23
181GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 154 164 155 150 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 143
Write 121
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 153
81% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
53.8% Above average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 19.8
MC Mixed 17
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 15.7
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,381 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $284
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback