Today's hottest deals

Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive23.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus EX-A320M-GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '22 at 02:35
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 67%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$60
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 42.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 219
62% 121 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 397
51% 388 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
Asus(1043 876B) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.23.04
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.7
Reflection 14
Parallax 20.5
12% 16.4 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 13.6
10% 12.2 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft 가상 디스크 38GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 56 52 46 42 43 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
23.7% Poor
Read 114
Write 162
Mixed 144
SusWrite 50.9
27% 118 MB/s
4K Read 11.4
4K Write 22.2
4K Mixed 14.4
48% 16 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 35.5
DQ Mixed 19.8
17% 23.8 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 47%
USB 3.0 super high speed 256GB
103GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 56 52 45 42 43 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 112
Write 187
Mixed 132
SusWrite 50.6
167% 120 MB/s
4K Read 11.3
4K Write 22.4
4K Mixed 15.5
1,331% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 18.7
1,812% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 157%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 11.4
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 8.6
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EX-A320M-GAMING Builds (Compare 1,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus EX-A320M-GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $283
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback