Today's hottest deals

Biostar A960D+

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar A960D+  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '16 at 05:16
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8120
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 82
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 104
51% 79.8 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 318
32% 262 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.7254
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.9% Above average
Lighting 71.8
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 67.6
58% 72.2 fps
MRender 72.6
Gravity 71.6
Splatting 73.9
60% 72.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RevuAhn_850X1S128GB 128GB
33GB free
Firmware: R0815B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 257
Write 225
Mixed 242
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 44.1
4K Mixed 27
89% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 113
DQ Mixed 51.3
56% 92.9 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 94%
Microsoft 가상 디스크 38GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
Read 248
Write 229
Mixed 248
54% 241 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 34.1
4K Mixed 13.1
63% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 96.1
DQ Mixed 51.2
51% 82.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 47%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$46
514GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 85.5
Write 74.3
Mixed 73.5
58% 77.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.68
4K Write 1.73
4K Mixed 0.26
90% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$42
55GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 127
Write 114
Mixed 110
88% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.75
4K Write 1.77
4K Mixed 0.64
135% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.7% Average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 17.2
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 11.6
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A960D+ Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar A960D+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $219
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback