Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Q536FD
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 12 '22 at 03:47
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8565U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 84.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
77% 136 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 401
48% 370 Pts
64-Core 421
26% 421 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 with Max-Q Design
Asus(1043 1B5E) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1169
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Lighting 26.1
Reflection 36.7
Parallax 29
21% 30.6 fps
MRender 33.6
Gravity 27.7
Splatting 20.2
22% 27.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 23%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W256G1102 256GB
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X6106002
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 280
Write 186
Mixed 134
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 27.2
89% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 365
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 240
203% 298 MB/s
Poor: 50% Great: 92%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
926GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 65.9
Write 103
Mixed 63.7
58% 77.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% Great: 67%
USB DISK 3.0 124GB
6GB free, PID 6400
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 207
Write 84.2
Mixed 119
154% 137 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 4.3
296% 5.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 57%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
13GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.3
Write 1.7
Mixed 13.2
12% 11.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
85% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K44BM0-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.9% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 19.3
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 20.7
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD Builds (Compare 134 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ZenBook Q536FD_Q536FD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback