Asrock H410M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	99.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock H410M-ITX/ac (all builds)
Memory	13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200723
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '22 at 16:26
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	EST-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-10100F-$70 39,812 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	45.5% Average	Memory 49.7 1-Core 80.3 2-Core 145 51% 91.8 Pts	4-Core 222 8-Core 426 38% 324 Pts	64-Core 392 24% 392 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 87%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
IR-SSDPR-P34B-256-80 256GB 190 User benchmarks, average bench 160% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFM22.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 435 224 214 203 216 216 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Read 676 Write 604 Mixed 573 SusWrite 251 118% 526 MB/s	4K Read 25.1 4K Write 72.8 4K Mixed 35.6 122% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 535 DQ Write 324 DQ Mixed 430 320% 430 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 212%
Apacer AS350 256GB 5,875 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 211GB free Firmware: S0920A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 210 205 198 205 227 MB/s Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.8% Above average	Read 260 Write 227 Mixed 211 SusWrite 205 51% 226 MB/s	4K Read 13.3 4K Write 47.1 4K Mixed 14 63% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 44.3 78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 100%
Apacer AS350 1TB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 693GB free Firmware: H190117H SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 225 218 209 217 240 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 73%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB 39,476 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 127 130 128 128 128 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.8% Good	Read 88.9 Write 99.2 Mixed 62 SusWrite 127 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 61.8% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB 122,822 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 24.1 MC Mixed 17.4 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 7.4 SC Write 12.5 SC Mixed 10 28% 9.97 GB/s	Latency 162 25% 162 ns
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H410M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 59%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-ITX/ac

CPU
Core i5-10400Intel $125Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	29x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	23x
Core i3-10100FIntel $70Bench 80%, 39,812 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $238Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	11x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	10x
RTX 2060Nvidia $294Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	9x

SSD
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $54Bench 191%, 5,987 samples	7x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	5x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	4x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2x8GBUnknownBench 77%, 23,800 samples	7x
2x8GBINNO8G3000SBench 77%, 8 samples	4x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 77% - Very good

Total price: $417

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16