Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsrock EP2C602-4L/D16  (all builds)
Memory49.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140116
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 05 '17 at 04:41
Run Duration289 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
48.7% Average
Memory 58.4
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 105
43% 72.1 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 369
35% 290 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1430 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35% Below average
Lighting 45.4
Reflection 42.8
Parallax 43.4
37% 43.9 fps
MRender 40.1
Gravity 39.9
Splatting 35
31% 38.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M510_MTFDDAV128MAZ 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 59% Great: 86%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
859GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
45.3% Average
Read 77.8
Write 79.7
Mixed 67.5
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.26
94% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 83%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
501GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 141
Write 123
Mixed 78.2
85% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.23
88% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 83%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB
3GB free, PID 5530
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
6.52% Terrible
Read 21.9
Write 8.34
Mixed 2.19
10% 10.8 MB/s
4K Read 6.19
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
24% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.52%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT151R7TFR4C Micron 36JSZF51272PY HMT151R7TFR4C Micron 36JSZF51272PY HMT151R7TFR4C Micron 36JSZF51272PY HMT151R7TFR4C Micron 36JSZF51272PY HMT1... 64GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.2% Very good
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 27.2
MC Mixed 28.1
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 4.9
16% 5.47 GB/s
Latency 132
30% 132 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback