Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	19.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0 26 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	65.5% Good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 71 2-Core 139 59% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 263 8-Core 498 45% 381 Pts	64-Core 1224 76% 1224 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V8800 (FireGL) 87 User benchmarks, average bench 18% AMD(1002 030C) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Lighting 26.6 Reflection 13.2 Parallax 26.5 22% 22.1 fps	MRender 12.2 Gravity 20.4 Splatting 18.3 14% 17 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SP900 512GB 926 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 257GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3b SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 127 137 133 121 121 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.8% Below average	Read 164 Write 153 Mixed 123 SusWrite 121 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 13.3 4K Mixed 15.4 49% 14.5 MB/s	DQ Read 125 DQ Write 77.7 DQ Mixed 85.5 68% 96.1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 65%
Samsung 850 2TB 54 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 1.5TB free Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 233 238 233 230 230 MB/s Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.9% Good	Read 255 Write 237 Mixed 225 SusWrite 234 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 32.4 102% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 158 DQ Write 118 DQ Mixed 121 95% 133 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 116%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 16,068 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 4GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.3 5.4 5.4 5.1 5.3 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Read 13.5 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.2 8% 6.68 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 8x8GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	79.6% Very good	MC Read 35.9 MC Write 30.5 MC Mixed 29.5 91% 32 GB/s	SC Read 11.3 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 6.5 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 76.5 52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 82%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 24%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	96x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	78x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples	76x

GPU
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	39x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	36x
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	35x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	27x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	21x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	19x

RAM
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	33x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	28x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 8x8GBHynix-00ADBench 87%, 150 samples	26x

Value: 27% - Poor

Total price: $85