Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory58.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170506
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateSep 17 '17 at 14:01
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 139
49% 86.9 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 500
45% 382 Pts
64-Core 1,273
79% 1,273 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V8800 (FireGL)
AMD(1002 030C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1010
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 26.4
Reflection 14.2
Parallax 24.2
22% 21.6 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 20.2
Splatting 18.4
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.9% Above average
Read 267
Write 251
Mixed 262
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 21.6
80% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 74.7
75% 120 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 116%
Adata SP900 512GB
409GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3b
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
48.3% Average
Read 266
Write 237
Mixed 225
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 16.3
59% 17 MB/s
DQ Read 142
DQ Write 80.1
DQ Mixed 48.6
53% 90.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 65%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
24GB free
Firmware: BBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.3% Average
Read 254
Write 137
Mixed 169
41% 187 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 17.8
75% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 34.6
49% 90 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 75%
WD My Passport 25AF 4TB
3TB free, PID 25af
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
37.3% Below average
Read 99.8
Write 88.9
Mixed 29.3
85% 72.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.89
4K Write 1.04
4K Mixed 0.35
50% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix-00AD HMT31GR7AFR4C-H9 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.7% Very good
MC Read 34.6
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 28.7
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.1
22% 7.7 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback