Asus P8B WS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8B WS  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120716
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJan 08 '19 at 13:30
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E31230
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 90.8
1-Core 90.6
2-Core 176
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 444
47% 377 Pts
64-Core 443
27% 443 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 74%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V8800 (FireGL)
AMD(1002 030C) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.8.1000
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
19.3% Very poor
Lighting 26.7
Reflection 15.1
Parallax 24.5
22% 22.1 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 18.4
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 318 318 309 302 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 115%
HPT DISK 0_1 300GB
273GB free
Firmware: 4.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 191 195 194 194 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
111% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 192
Mixed 89.8
SusWrite 192
122% 167 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 1.6
307% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 111%
This bench: 111%
Great: 113%
HKVSN ESSD-T100/120G 120GB
112GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 200
Write 238
Mixed 199
278% 212 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 12.8
1,125% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 14.7
DQ Write 18.1
DQ Mixed 16
1,214% 16.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
29.1% Poor
MC Read 9.6
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 8.4
26% 8.93 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.7
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B WS Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8B WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $655
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback