Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	19.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	74% Very good	Memory 90.8 1-Core 90.6 2-Core 176 71% 119 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 444 47% 377 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 74% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI FirePro V8800 (FireGL) 87 User benchmarks, average bench 18% AMD(1002 030C) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.982.8.1000 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Lighting 26.7 Reflection 15.1 Parallax 24.5 22% 22.1 fps	MRender 12.9 Gravity 20.5 Splatting 18.4 14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HPT DISK 0_0 2TB 89 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 318 318 309 302 164 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 41% Great: 115%
HPT DISK 0_1 300GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 273GB free Firmware: 4.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 194 191 195 194 194 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	111% Outstanding	Read 196 Write 192 Mixed 89.8 SusWrite 192 122% 167 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 3.6 4K Mixed 1.6 307% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 113%
HKVSN ESSD-T100/120G 120GB 112GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples		Read 200 Write 238 Mixed 199 278% 212 MB/s	4K Read 19.1 4K Write 18.2 4K Mixed 12.8 1,125% 16.7 MB/s	DQ Read 14.7 DQ Write 18.1 DQ Mixed 16 1,214% 16.3 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.6 MC Write 8.8 MC Mixed 8.4 26% 8.93 GB/s	SC Read 8.6 SC Write 9.8 SC Mixed 9.7 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 46%

Yacht

RAM
M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173EB0-YK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 16GBSamsungBench 52%, 39 samples	4x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	4x
CT51264BA160B.C16F 4x4GBCrucialBench 51%, 589 samples	4x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $655