Today's hottest deals

Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.39% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDream NS5x_NS7xPU  (all builds)
MotherboardDream NS5x_NS7xPU
Memory2.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220608
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 21 '22 at 15:11
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1220P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 57.2
1-Core 148
2-Core 248
81% 151 Pts
4-Core 376
8-Core 537
57% 457 Pts
64-Core 658
41% 658 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 7716) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.39% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 9.2
7% 9.7 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 10.8
Splatting 8.4
8% 9.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.39%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme BIWIN CE480T5D101-512 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0.0.M Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 603 665 664 786 795 784 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
160% Outstanding
Read 941
Write 889
Mixed 938
SusWrite 716
196% 871 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 44.9
199% 68.2 MB/s
DQ Read 597
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 182
197% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 160%
Great: 160%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
ACPI Digital Co Ltd CMB6-DGDA1BAR08D00 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.1
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 18.1
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 136
29% 136 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS5x_NS7xPU Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Dream NS5x_NS7xPU

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback