Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14J1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
11 months ago, 8 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 C12MO
MotherboardMSI MS-14J1  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 18 '24 at 19:29
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 121
2-Core 224
74% 136 Pts
4-Core 359
8-Core 469
53% 414 Pts
64-Core 550
34% 550 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 134E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.46% Terrible
Lighting 13
Reflection 20.6
Parallax 15.3
11% 16.3 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 2.5
Splatting 1.3
1% 1.73 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.46%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Phison 256GB ESR256GTLCW-E9C-2MS
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 1137
Write 97.7
Mixed 215
103% 483 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 41.8
100% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 782
DQ Write 103
DQ Mixed 367
288% 417 MB/s
Poor: 98% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 32.1
MC Mixed 28.7
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 21.6
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 63 45 0 13.9" 1280 720 CMN142B
Typical MS-14J1 Builds (Compare 142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14J1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback