Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-14J1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics7.02% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star Modern 14 C12M
MotherboardMSI MS-14J1  (all builds)
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230810
Uptime5 Days
Run DateMay 07 '24 at 08:50
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 71.8
1-Core 180
2-Core 332
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 752
77% 623 Pts
64-Core 753
47% 753 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 134E) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4314
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.02% Terrible
Lighting 12.9
Reflection 17.7
Parallax 15.1
10% 15.2 fps
MRender 0.4
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.3
0% 0.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.02%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Phison 256GB ESR256GTLCW-E9C-2MS
99GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EJFM61.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 47 60 48 47 57 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
101% Outstanding
Read 365
Write 864
Mixed 347
SusWrite 58.6
93% 409 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 134
4K Mixed 66.2
196% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 857
DQ Write 66.4
DQ Mixed 344
280% 423 MB/s
Poor: 98%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.1
MC Mixed 29.4
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 22.8
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN142B
Typical MS-14J1 Builds (Compare 143 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-14J1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback