Today's hottest deals

Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.21% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H61M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '22 at 02:48
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3330
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 159
66% 110 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 294
38% 287 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630
Asus(1043 846A) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 451.67
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
5.21% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 4.9
Parallax 7.9
5% 6.4 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.21%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKP1B5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 58 142 58 MB/s
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54% Above average
Read 256
Write 193
Mixed 210
SusWrite 99.1
42% 190 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 57.6
4K Mixed 26.1
106% 37.1 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 44.5
DQ Mixed 1.3
33% 83.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
756GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 175 175 176 181 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 186
Write 172
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 176
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 104%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback