Today's hottest deals

Intel NUC11ATBC4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemIntel(R) NUC11ATKC4
MotherboardIntel NUC11ATBC4  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 00:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5105
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
31.7% Below average
Memory 54
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 50.7
34% 50.1 Pts
4-Core 52.5
8-Core 125
10% 88.9 Pts
64-Core 120
8% 120 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 3027) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1191
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
3.77% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.9
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 7.3
4% 4.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.77%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM6A1 256GB
207GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9139
SusWrite @10s intervals: 539 523 731 518 549 591 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.3% Excellent
Read 504
Write 593
Mixed 573
SusWrite 575
127% 561 MB/s
4K Read 9.2
4K Write 24.8
4K Mixed 17.9
50% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 364
DQ Write 180
DQ Mixed 210
172% 251 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 193%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2R1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.2% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 12.7
MC Mixed 11.5
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 9.6
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 146
27% 146 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NUC11ATBC4 Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel NUC11ATBC4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback