bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory1.8 GB free of 7 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120523
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 10:53
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 4171 HE
None, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
32% Below average
Memory 53.4
1-Core 26.4
2-Core 44.4
29% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 62.4
8-Core 70
9% 66.2 Pts
64-Core 69.3
4% 69.3 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
988GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68% Good
Read 140
Write 97.3
Mixed 94.7
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 0.46
4K Mixed 0.2
38% 0.28 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 68%
Great: 68%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 1TB
917GB free
Firmware: 1.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 133
Write 101
Mixed 95.6
82% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.21
4K Write 0.14
4K Mixed 0.31
46% 0.22 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 68%
Virtual HD 306GB
281GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 31% Great: 74%
Virtual HD 136GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0 Max speed: PIO DMA 16 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 36.9
Write 10.5
Mixed 16
16% 21.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.24
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.27
46% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
512, 6656 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 9.4
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 9
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 3.8
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.2
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback