Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590S-$79 11,598 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 80.9 1-Core 92 2-Core 181 68% 118 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 274 34% 258 Pts	64-Core 296 18% 296 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4870-X2 (Crossfire Disabled) 438 User benchmarks, average bench 7% AMD(1002 2542) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 8.5 Reflection 9 Parallax 6.4 7% 7.97 fps	MRender 6.1 Gravity 6.3 Splatting 6.5 5% 6.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 8%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk X110 128GB-$89 11,245 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 93GB free (System drive) Firmware: X231706 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 360 Write 271 Mixed 169 59% 266 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 75.2 4K Mixed 31.1 122% 44.7 MB/s	DQ Read 279 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 117 117% 190 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 89%
USB Flash Disk 8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 2GB free, PID 2000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 12.5 Write 0.7 Mixed 6 6% 6.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 16% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-YK0 1315 CT51264BA160B.C16F 8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	52% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 16.4 52% 18.2 GB/s	SC Read 12.7 SC Write 17.4 SC Mixed 14.7 43% 14.9 GB/s	Latency 78.9 51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	149x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	75x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 1x4GBMicronBench 28%, 7,085 samples	27x
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 5,816 samples	21x
M378B5173QH0-CK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,599 samples	15x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $122