TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Z8 G4 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 144%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 218%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics206% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory1536GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 1536GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP Z8 G4 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81C7
Memory1511.3 GB free of 1536 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210928
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 18:07
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 6242
CPU0, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 53.6
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
71% 136 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 899
80% 676 Pts
64-Core 3,262
202% 3,262 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑
This bench: 69.3%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX A6000
HP(103C 1459) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4000 MHz, Ram: 48GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
206% Outstanding
Lighting 300
Reflection 289
Parallax 317
244% 302 fps
MRender 327
Gravity 276
Splatting 192
209% 265 fps
Poor: 174% ↑
This bench: 206%
 Great: 218%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HBHQ-000H1 256GB
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0NEXH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 516 451 410 409 405 397 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 2,116
Write 2,036
Mixed 1448
SusWrite 431
337% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 98
4K Mixed 61.5
201% 68.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1008
DQ Write 720
DQ Mixed 959
691% 896 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑
This bench: 212%
 Great: 253%
WDC WD20EZBX-60AYRA0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 234 235 233 232 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 268
Write 237
Mixed 150
SusWrite 234
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 1.3
71% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.8
2% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 44.2%
 Great: 46%
Kxg60pnv2t04 KIOXIA 2TB
4TB free
Firmware: HP00AH40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3083 3100 3115 3140 3134 3135 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
394% Outstanding
Read 2,372
Write 3,616
Mixed 1,979
SusWrite 3,118
628% 2771 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 55.4
215% 82.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,167
DQ Write 795
DQ Mixed 1,005
744% 989 MB/s
Poor: 120% ↑
This bench: 394%
 Great: 321%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A8G40MB2-CVF 24x32GB
24 of 24 slots used
767GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
134% Outstanding
MC Read 57.1
MC Write 52.9
MC Mixed 61.4
163% 57.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 7.1
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 148
27% 148 ns
Poor: 134% ↑
This bench: 134%
 Great: 149%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z8 G4 Workstation Builds (Compare 819 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 78%
Battleship

System: HP Z8 G4 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon Silver 41141stBench 63%, 670 samples61x
CPU: Intel Xeon Gold 61341stBench 78%, 153 samples55x
Xeon Silver 4108IntelBench 60%, 331 samples31x
GPU
Quadro P5000NvidiaBench 89%, 8,562 samples102x
RTX A4000NvidiaBench 132%, 4,246 samples73x
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples70x
SSD
MZVLB1T0HBLR-000H1 1TBSamsungBench 264%, 8,018 samples49x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 250%, 4,056 samples40x
MZVLB1T0HALR-000H2 1TBSamsungBench 267%, 633 samples33x
RAM
HMA81GR7CJR8N-WM 12x8GBHynixBench 112%, 37 samples21x
HMA84GR7CJR4N-VK 4x31.8GBHynixBench 92%, 67 samples18x
M393A2K40CB2-CTD 4x16GBSamsungBench 80%, 161 samples17x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback