Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	25.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 10 '17 at 19:46
Run Duration	252 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4670K-$62 128,482 User benchmarks, average bench 68% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	80.1% Excellent	Memory 90.5 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 79% 138 Pts	4-Core 404 8-Core 404 54% 404 Pts	64-Core 401 25% 401 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 80.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% MSI(1462 2847) 2GB CLim: 1241 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	25.9% Poor	Lighting 29.5 Reflection 27.1 Parallax 33.6 24% 30.1 fps	MRender 39.5 Gravity 37.6 Splatting 33 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk S240G 3TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2.5TB free Firmware: MKAOA800 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 136 136 80 (03) Spinup time 140 140 51571917414 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 63 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 43 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 123 123 31 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 418 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 54 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 75 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 75 (C2) HDA temperature 162 162 206159085605 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 44 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 41 41 1240 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	11% Very poor	Read 130 Write 92.5 Mixed 128 26% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.32 4K Mixed 0.09 0% 0.16 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 23%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30 133,640 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 223GB free Firmware: Z32070RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 53 (A5) Unknown 100 100 4295491590 (A6) Unknown 100 100 0 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 1 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 37 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 58 47 227633266730 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 8589934594 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 13 (EA) Unknown 100 100 62 (F1) Unknown 253 253 56 (F2) Unknown 253 253 48 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	75.7% Very good	Read 478 Write 417 Mixed 464 101% 453 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 78.3 4K Mixed 0.01 76% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 272 DQ Mixed 6.42 72% 168 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 86%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8613 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2826 (B1) Unknown 88 88 134 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 53 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 586 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30889676924
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 425GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 3548 (03) Spinup time 173 167 2333 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4025 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8686 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2327 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 50 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3974 (C2) HDA temperature 108 98 35 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 35 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.3% Good	Read 128 Write 107 Mixed 117 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.14 4K Write 0.49 4K Mixed 0.12 29% 0.25 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$80 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 400GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 88425232 (03) Spinup time 92 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1444 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 77 60 52673436 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 6382 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1393 (B7) Unknown 1 1 281 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 4295033093 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 68 56 538640416 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 1528 (C2) HDA temperature 32 44 64424509472 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 33 7 88425232 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 197 329 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 63604170692897 (F1) Unknown 100 253 462229914 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1643098984	40.8% Average	Read 78.9 Write 63.6 Mixed 80.1 56% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.17 4K Write 0.56 4K Mixed 0.29 50% 0.34 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 M378B5273CH0-CK0 0215 CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 17.7 55% 19.2 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 19.3 50% 17.7 GB/s	Latency 66.5 60% 66.5 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,825 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,641x
Core i5-4690KIntel $50Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	457x
Core i7-4790Intel $132Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	227x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	410x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	232x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	161x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	108x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	105x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	80x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	111x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	107x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	92x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363