Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 13:12
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690S-$141
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 322
42% 314 Pts
64-Core 314
19% 314 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Gigabyte(1458 3553) 1GB
CLim: 1110 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.56% Terrible
Lighting 9.5
Reflection 12.4
Parallax 12
8% 11.3 fps
MRender 14.1
Gravity 12.4
Splatting 11.2
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.56%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxsun 240GB X5 240GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VA001CB6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 272 356 414 411 298 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 434
Write 404
Mixed 361
SusWrite 347
87% 386 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 92.2
4K Mixed 34.7
130% 50.4 MB/s
DQ Read 106
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 160
132% 182 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 90%
NV900-256 256GB
170GB free
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 307 227 120 90 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 373
Write 313
Mixed 322
SusWrite 193
67% 300 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 28.3
154% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 290
DQ Mixed 272
221% 315 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87%
Great: 196%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B1G73QH0-CK0 0913 M378B1G73EB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.9% Good
MC Read 21.4
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,046 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $60

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $166Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback