Supermicro H8SGL

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive77.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro H8SGL  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro H8SGL
Memory5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160318
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 16:21
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron 6380
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
47% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 43.3
2-Core 85.7
40% 63.7 Pts
4-Core 173
8-Core 318
29% 245 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
Dell(1028 0081) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
7.09% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 10.9
Parallax 14.1
7% 11.2 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 9.4
Splatting 8.4
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.09%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
LSI MegaRAID SAS RMB 255GB
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.40
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 170 171 172 173 170 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.8% Very good
Read 649
Write 53.1
Mixed 272
SusWrite 171
62% 286 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 25.8
122% 31.9 MB/s
DQ Read 172
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 111
84% 115 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 78%
USB3.0 Mobile Storage 480GB
285GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 234 232 107 88 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
170% Outstanding
Read 218
Write 141
Mixed 216
SusWrite 164
245% 185 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 22.7
1,930% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 43.5
DQ Mixed 28
2,524% 32.1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 170%
Great: 173%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B2873FH0-CF8 M391B2873FH0-CF8 M391B2873FH0-CF8 M391B2873EH1-CF8 M391B2873EH1-CF8 M391B2873FH0-CF8 M391B2873EH1-CF8 M391B2873EH1-CF8 8GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.4% Average
MC Read 19.2
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 19.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 8.2
19% 6.53 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H8SGL Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Supermicro H8SGL

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback