Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive168% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515JF
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 27 '22 at 01:53
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
46.4% Average
Memory 40.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 181
59% 110 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 430
44% 356 Pts
64-Core 386
24% 386 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1EFF) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 7.6
6% 8.77 fps
MRender 7
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 1
4% 5.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SM2P32A8-256GC1 256GB
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VC0S0304
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1337 1131 557 53 56 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
168% Outstanding
Read 1,199
Write 1,353
Mixed 1,096
SusWrite 736
247% 1,096 MB/s
4K Read 38.4
4K Write 98.7
4K Mixed 54.6
180% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 392
DQ Write 444
DQ Mixed 528
367% 454 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 168%
Great: 213%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
WHS84S8AZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.8% Poor
MC Read 8.4
MC Write 9.9
MC Mixed 7.4
24% 8.57 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 5.7
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515JF_X515JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback