Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 101%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics145% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory45.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 03 '23 at 09:37
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 92.1
1-Core 130
2-Core 244
88% 155 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 553
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 651
40% 651 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Asus(1043 866B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 522.30
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
145% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 185
Parallax 214
157% 197 fps
MRender 244
Gravity 200
Splatting 145
155% 196 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 145%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90
141GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 297 202 174 173 170 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Read 425
Write 436
Mixed 362
SusWrite 224
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 76.4
4K Mixed 47.2
152% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 134%
Samsung 850 EVO 2TB
246GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 335 345 337 337 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 447
Mixed 354
SusWrite 335
89% 394 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 83.1
4K Mixed 50.5
166% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 362
272% 362 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 106%
Great: 130%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$275
670GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 335 351 352 365 359 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 456
Write 440
Mixed 387
SusWrite 348
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 81.7
4K Mixed 50
163% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 363
273% 364 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 107%
Great: 135%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141
87GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 312 321 322 326 327 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 348
Mixed 298
SusWrite 319
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 36.3
125% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 317
DQ Mixed 196
176% 263 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 103%
WD Purple Surveillance 6TB (2017)-$100
2.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 14 17 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 34.7
MC Mixed 28.4
90% 31.3 GB/s
SC Read 20.2
SC Write 35.9
SC Mixed 27.4
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback