Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Boot Drive391% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI  (all builds)
Memory53.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 00:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X-$520
AM5, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 4.5 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 74.3
1-Core 205
2-Core 391
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 772
8-Core 1,444
132% 1,108 Pts
64-Core 3,600
223% 3,600 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$120
868GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2206 2395 2271 2195 1786 1459 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
391% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 3,107
Mixed 2,793
SusWrite 2,052
599% 2,654 MB/s
4K Read 68.9
4K Write 147
4K Mixed 86.7
293% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,740
DQ Write 1,341
DQ Mixed 1,511
1,138% 1,531 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 391%
Great: 477%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
28GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 89.4
Write 30.9
Mixed 39.9
58% 53.4 MB/s
4K Read 6.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2
138% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 39%
General UDisk 134GB
32GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 19.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 13.2
19% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
23% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT64GX5M2B5200Z40 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
147% Outstanding
MC Read 56.7
MC Write 50.5
MC Mixed 52.5
152% 53.2 GB/s
SC Read 47.1
SC Write 58.6
SC Mixed 42.5
141% 49.4 GB/s
Latency 91.9
44% 91.9 ns
Poor: 147%
This bench: 147%
Great: 267%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 402%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 527%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ProArt X670E-CREATOR WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $2,380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback