Today's hottest deals

Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory23.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime5.8 Days
Run DateJan 08 '23 at 14:38
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$127
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 211
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 567
58% 468 Pts
64-Core 595
37% 595 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$400
Asus(1043 87BC) ≥ 4GB; asus dual
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 211
Reflection 195
Parallax 183
172% 196 fps
MRender 185
Gravity 146
Splatting 130
123% 154 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 144%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 68 73 68 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Read 411
Write 430
Mixed 400
SusWrite 74.1
74% 329 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 68.4
4K Mixed 41
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 358
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 128%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 490GB
53GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 232 275 169 171 112 81 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 424
Write 412
Mixed 289
SusWrite 173
73% 325 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 67.5
4K Mixed 42.1
138% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 325
255% 353 MB/s
Poor: 87%
This bench: 87%
Great: 115%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$54
429GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 19 20 20 12 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 24.4
MC Write 26.6
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.2 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 26.8
SC Mixed 21.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,367 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $651
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback