Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20150921
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 17 '17 at 12:33
Run Duration250 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon L5630
CPU socket #0, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
50.9% Above average
Memory 63.6
1-Core 51
2-Core 101
44% 71.9 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 416
37% 311 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 55%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 9TB
2TB free
Firmware: 6.64
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
80% Very good
Read 562
Write 522
Mixed 254
99% 446 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 31.7
4K Mixed 4.47
79% 24.6 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 61.2
DQ Mixed 10.5
29% 62.8 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 80%
Great: 80%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 12TB
1TB free
Firmware: 6.64
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.7% Above average
Read 522
Write 185
Mixed 215
67% 307 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 28.9
4K Mixed 0.35
63% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 67.7
DQ Mixed 5.14
31% 73.5 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 102%
Msft Virtual HD 215GB
165GB free
Firmware: 6.3
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
21.2% Poor
Read 185
Write 117
Mixed 149
33% 150 MB/s
4K Read 7.81
4K Write 11
4K Mixed 0.8
19% 6.54 MB/s
DQ Read 41.5
DQ Write 30.1
DQ Mixed 3.03
11% 24.9 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 45%
HP LOGICAL VOLUME 9TB
148GB free
Firmware: 6.64
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 46% Great: 80%
Vmware Virtual disk 43GB
22GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 189
Write 196
Mixed 195
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 11.7
53% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.8
DQ Write 42.2
DQ Mixed 13.8
16% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 64 slots used
16GB DIMM DRAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
45.1% Average
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 18.8
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback