Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics98.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
21 months ago, 21 months ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJan 23 '23 at 21:48
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 724
70% 573 Pts
64-Core 913
56% 913 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$282
HP(103C 8903) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (38th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
98.3% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 115
Parallax 119
105% 121 fps
MRender 140
Gravity 99.7
Splatting 86.5
86% 109 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$35
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 338 358 146 158 153 365 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
59.7% Above average
Read 447
Write 357
Mixed 281
SusWrite 253
75% 334 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 13.7
71% 23.6 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 97.1
DQ Mixed 26.7
45% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64AZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55.3% Above average
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 16
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 17.9
48% 17 GB/s
Latency 69.6
57% 69.6 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,791 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback