Asus PRIME A320M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-R  (all builds)
Memory14.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 26 '23 at 16:58
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 74.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 274
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 726
80% 630 Pts
64-Core 774
48% 774 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 590-$80
CLim: 1545 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
59.3% Above average
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 103
62% 82.2 fps
MRender 68.6
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 53
55% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 62%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Fast DATA 240G 240GB
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1104C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 395 414 422 421 413 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
96.5% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 437
Mixed 370
SusWrite 409
96% 429 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 14.7
149% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 16
69% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 96.5%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HKED4081CAA1D0MA1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
79.4% Very good
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 31.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 29.5
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-R Builds (Compare 626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-R

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $308
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback