Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display800 x 1280 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 27 '23 at 04:19
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Memory 42.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 228
66% 129 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 535
56% 450 Pts
64-Core 536
33% 536 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 64%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SDXC 1TB
894GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 18 19 18 18 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
19.8% Very poor
Read 51.1
Write 15.9
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 17.9
18% 24.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
47% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.8%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown K3LK7K70BM-BGCP000 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
66.6% Good
MC Read 22
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 28
70% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 22.9
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 192
21% 192 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback