Valve Jupiter

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemValve Jupiter  (all builds)
MotherboardValve Jupiter
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 30 '23 at 20:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Custom APU 0405
FP6, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Memory 37.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 224
64% 126 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 527
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 549
34% 549 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Custom GPU 0405
AMD(1002 0123) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.40.33.02
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 25.3
Parallax 31.8
15% 25.1 fps
MRender 22.5
Gravity 20.8
Splatting 27.7
20% 23.7 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM3PDP3512B-A01 512GB
197GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 280 278 289 297 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,117
Write 1083
Mixed 1,029
SusWrite 305
198% 883 MB/s
4K Read 38.6
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 54.5
203% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 571
DQ Mixed 746
533% 685 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 155%
Great: 196%
SDXC 1TB
907GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 77 79 82 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 86.6
Write 75.5
Mixed 64.9
SusWrite 78.9
57% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 5.3
988% 5.67 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MT62F1G32D4DR-031 WT 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB 23h 4266 MHz clocked @ 5500 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.4% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 27.3
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 22.4
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 213
19% 213 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Jupiter Builds (Compare 49 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Valve Jupiter

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback