Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 06:37
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 76.8
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 185
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 738
64% 543 Pts
64-Core 2,201
136% 2,201 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super)-$466
Nvidia(10DE 13A0) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3875 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (41st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 174
Reflection 171
Parallax 172
142% 172 fps
MRender 197
Gravity 154
Splatting 127
126% 159 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 129%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP1000GM30023 1TB
899GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SU6SM003
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,967
Write 2,296
Mixed 2,052
472% 2,105 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 97.6
4K Mixed 67.1
215% 72 MB/s
DQ Read 832
DQ Write 525
DQ Mixed 716
523% 691 MB/s
Poor: 233% Great: 504%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
2TB free
Firmware: 1A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 401
Write 400
Mixed 138
229% 313 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 7
4K Mixed 1.6
1,049% 8.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 64GB-$25
59GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.8
Write 17
Mixed 21
29% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.8
167% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2133 C13 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2137 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 57.7
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 46.2
141% 49.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 18.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 102%
This bench: 122%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,409 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $686
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $168Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback