Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 42% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	32.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

14 months ago, 14 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0 (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 04 '23 at 02:07
Run Duration	131 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 86.4 1-Core 122 2-Core 240 84% 150 Pts	4-Core 478 8-Core 585 68% 531 Pts	64-Core 606 38% 606 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Nvidia(10DE 139D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.5% Above average	Lighting 75.8 Reflection 74.9 Parallax 71.6 62% 74.1 fps	MRender 62.2 Gravity 73.4 Splatting 57.5 52% 64.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
KNUP-SSD-240GB 240GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 133GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1128B0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 7.6 31 43 18 26 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 440 Write 354 Mixed 19.1 SusWrite 51.4 47% 216 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 14.2 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 11.2 MB/s	DQ Read 66.7 DQ Write 15.3 DQ Mixed 0.5 11% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 82%
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$18 39,749 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 96GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 51 52 51 51 52 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	30.6% Below average	Read 55.2 Write 44.4 Mixed 33.3 SusWrite 51.3 34% 46.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.6% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL16-18-18 D4-3000 1x8GB 3,719 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.4% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.3 MC Mixed 10.8 36% 12.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.7 SC Write 13.2 SC Mixed 11.3 34% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 27%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	1,072x
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples	931x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	279x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	356x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	296x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	231x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	300x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	158x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	132x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	158x
HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GBKingstonBench 44%, 32,519 samples	89x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	83x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $263

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16