Today's hottest deals

Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory110.5 GB free of 128 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 04 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 77.9
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 610
55% 464 Pts
64-Core 1,469
91% 1,469 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$131
CLim: 1366 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 65.7
Reflection 62.1
Parallax 98.6
54% 75.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 75.1
Splatting 46.6
49% 62 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 56%
AMD HD 7750
Device(1545 7750) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.66% Terrible
Lighting 8.8
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.7
7% 13 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.66%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$390
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 333 332 347 356 348 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 450
Write 345
Mixed 372
SusWrite 341
85% 377 MB/s
4K Read 17.5
4K Write 10.8
4K Mixed 17
54% 15.1 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 42.5
DQ Mixed 67.1
55% 80.7 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 131%
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
206GB free
Firmware: X231
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 251 196 244 214 238 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 422
Write 273
Mixed 116
SusWrite 224
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 20.3
70% 22.7 MB/s
DQ Read 198
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 122
103% 153 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 99%
Samsung 860 Evo 4TB-$380
2.5TB free
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 361 346 356 357 365 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 385
Write 391
Mixed 369
SusWrite 356
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 32.7
4K Mixed 26.3
86% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 155
DQ Mixed 176
131% 174 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$690
1.5TB free
Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 815 831 791 818 826 832 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
127% Outstanding
Read 1,171
Write 884
Mixed 680
SusWrite 819
199% 888 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 19.2
81% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 123
DQ Mixed 136
102% 136 MB/s
Poor: 162%
This bench: 127%
Great: 354%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 66TB
42TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 15 20 18 18 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
25.9% Poor
Read 62.7
Write 17.2
Mixed 22
SusWrite 27.5
24% 32.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 25.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1G70BH0-YK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0... 128GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
90% Outstanding
MC Read 39.8
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 32.7
104% 36.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 7.2
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 84.5
47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 90%
This bench: 90%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 715 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback