Intel X99H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive20.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221019
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 23:19
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
61.6% Good
Memory 80.2
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 124
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 233
8-Core 384
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 22F9) ≥ 4GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.13033.1000
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.4% Below average
Lighting 43.9
Reflection 52.7
Parallax 70.4
36% 55.7 fps
MRender 53.8
Gravity 60.7
Splatting 38.6
41% 51 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 37.4%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 53 40 34 37 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
20.7% Poor
Read 155
Write 95.3
Mixed 91.8
SusWrite 36.4
21% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 15.4
4K Mixed 9.5
37% 12 MB/s
DQ Read 20.6
DQ Write 21.1
DQ Mixed 18.2
14% 20 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 100%
Toshiba MQ01ABD032 320GB-$50
16GB free
Firmware: AX001A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 71 71 71 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 68.8
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 70.9
42% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 54%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
67GB free
Firmware: 02.03E02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 82 81 84 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 81.3
Write 92.2
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 81.1
57% 78 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 1x16GB
1 of 24 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.8
SC Write 9.4
SC Mixed 9.6
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 80.1
50% 80.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback