Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive34.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte A320M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200803
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 11:49
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 84.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 249
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 487
8-Core 734
76% 611 Pts
64-Core 941
58% 941 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.6% Average
Lighting 56.9
Reflection 57.7
Parallax 78
46% 64.2 fps
MRender 58.1
Gravity 64
Splatting 44
44% 55.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid WDC WDS480G2G0B- 480GB
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UK50
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 2.6 45 1.8 12 2.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.4% Below average
Read 411
Write 360
Mixed 288
SusWrite 30.2
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 9.8
4K Write 31.4
4K Mixed 11.5
46% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 46.3
DQ Write 43.5
DQ Mixed 17.6
21% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 34%
Amd-raid Array 3 274GB
251GB free
Firmware: 9.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 470 437 214 142 146 144 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 373
Write 476
Mixed 377
SusWrite 259
84% 371 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 69.8
4K Mixed 24
94% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 58.1
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 67.5
61% 88.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 64%
Amd-raid WDC WD42PURZ-85B 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 143 135 117 115 112 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.9% Average
Read 32.7
Write 143
Mixed 47.3
SusWrite 129
64% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.7
214% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 93%
ASMT 2105 2TB
544GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 158 156 156 158 157 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 122
Write 118
Mixed 28.1
SusWrite 157
142% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 38.9
MC Mixed 33
108% 37.9 GB/s
SC Read 28.4
SC Write 38.9
SC Mixed 31.3
94% 32.9 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,028 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback