Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.38% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNBB17
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110603
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 12:04
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.6% Below average
Memory 59.7
1-Core 55.7
2-Core 88.8
43% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 91.8
8-Core 97.8
12% 94.8 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 410M
Fujitsu(10CF 1656) 1GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.38% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.57 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.7
Splatting 1.6
2% 1.93 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.38%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ae100 960GB 960GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMKA.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 303 296 315 306 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 328
Write 330
Mixed 300
SusWrite 258
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 35.7
4K Mixed 21.3
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 153
127% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 106%
ASMT 2235 1TB
763GB free, PID 225c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 12 12 10 11 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Read 52.1
Write 12.4
Mixed 13.2
SusWrite 11.5
24% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 261%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 11.7
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK LH531 Builds (Compare 50 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK LH531

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 15% - Very poor Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback