Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 228%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 268%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 113%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics207% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive250% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory18 GB free of 32 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210909
Uptime6.6 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 00:35
Run Duration272 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Memory 74
1-Core 200
2-Core 402
116% 225 Pts
4-Core 812
8-Core 1,485
138% 1,148 Pts
64-Core 2706
168% 2706 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 113%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
207% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 269
Parallax 319
253% 300 fps
MRender 328
Gravity 244
Splatting 176
196% 249 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 207%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP1000GM30002 1TB
240GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1146 451 864 968 963 953 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
250% Outstanding
Read 1,033
Write 2,104
Mixed 128
SusWrite 891
235% 1,039 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 248
4K Mixed 65.4
302% 124 MB/s
DQ Read 1,987
DQ Write 903
DQ Mixed 1,096
905% 1,329 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 250%
Great: 492%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
36GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 108 118 109 111 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 353
Write 141
Mixed 293
SusWrite 124
51% 228 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 36.2
132% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 64.4
DQ Mixed 66
72% 126 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 83%
OCZ Trion 100 240GB-$95
9GB free
Firmware: SAFM11.2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 375
Mixed 281
76% 342 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 77
4K Mixed 34.4
106% 41.9 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 156
137% 205 MB/s
Poor: 47% Great: 83%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$139
5GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,150
Write 757
Mixed 656
189% 854 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 62.2
236% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,151
DQ Write 1051
DQ Mixed 990
773% 1,064 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Seagate Backup+ Desktop 4TB
113GB free
Firmware: 1404
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 124 111 114 122 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 52
Write 78.5
Mixed 81
SusWrite 120
62% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.5
236% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
897GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 71 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
49.8% Average
Read 101
Write 90.8
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 71.9
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 67%
WD Elements 25A3 18TB
14TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 202 189 218 210 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 224
Mixed 158
SusWrite 207
273% 201 MB/s
4K Read 7
4K Write 9.8
4K Mixed 2.2
434% 6.33 MB/s
DQ Read 2.3
DQ Write 9.1
DQ Mixed 1.9
383% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 108%
Great: 111%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl -6400J3239G162x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 54.1
MC Write 49.4
MC Mixed 48.4
145% 50.6 GB/s
SC Read 17
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 24.4
78% 27.5 GB/s
Latency 92.5
43% 92.5 ns
Poor: 130%
This bench: 130%
Great: 208%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,721 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 126% - Outstanding Total price: $1,094
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback