Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics19.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 2 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
SystemVMware, VMware Virtual Platform
MotherboardIntel 440BX Desktop Reference Platform
Memory119.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160405
Uptime2.9 Days
Run DateNov 24 '17 at 06:46
Run Duration321 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
CPU #000, 2 CPU, 32 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 74.5
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
71% 126 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 805
71% 605 Pts
64-Core 2,094
130% 2,094 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GRID M60-4Q
Nvidia(10DE 114F) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
19.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 25.7
Parallax 20.8
18% 22.9 fps
MRender 31.8
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 29
23% 27.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Vmware Virtual disk 215GB
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.0
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 86%
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 4GB-$15
2GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Read 9.86
Write 3.64
Mixed 5.12
7% 6.21 MB/s
4K Read 2.04
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.01
8% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 128 slots used
128GB DIMM DRAM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 56.2
MC Write 35.7
MC Mixed 38.3
124% 43.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.4
SC Mixed 18.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 91.5
44% 91.5 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,862 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback