Chuwi GemiBook Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (99%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemChuwi GemiBook Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault JS131
Memory2.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221229
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 05 '23 at 13:22
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 99%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
25.3% Poor
Memory 31.5
1-Core 37.5
2-Core 70.3
27% 46.4 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 108
15% 109 Pts
64-Core 116
7% 116 Pts
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9565
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
2.71% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.63 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 4.6
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.71%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
G521N256GB 256GB
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 139 172 177 152 163 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 152
Write 159
Mixed 124
SusWrite 160
34% 149 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 12.2
4K Mixed 3.7
24% 8.07 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 74
DQ Mixed 12.1
31% 66.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 53E1G32D4NQ-046WTE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips LPDDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.6% Poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 9.6
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.5
15% 5.2 GB/s
Latency 246
16% 246 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GemiBook Pro Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Chuwi GemiBook Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback