Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180326
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 03:26
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4590-$188
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 196
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 317
8-Core 329
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$267
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 118
Parallax 122
108% 124 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 104
Splatting 88.8
89% 112 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD-512G 512GB
435GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0915A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 224 371 415 442 442 442 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 403
Mixed 412
SusWrite 389
95% 421 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 84.2
4K Mixed 28.4
128% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 45.3
96% 192 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$35
368GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 119 120 121 121 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 112
Write 115
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 118
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G9P1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
60.6% Good
MC Read 21.7
MC Write 23.1
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback