Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20170609
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '23 at 13:22
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 382
49% 370 Pts
64-Core 379
24% 379 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.6% Above average
Lighting 68.2
Reflection 74.9
Parallax 69.2
56% 70.8 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 70.2
Splatting 66.3
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ssd 512GB
184GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HCS1A25E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 281 102 69 37 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 416
Write 361
Mixed 315
SusWrite 132
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 7.1
92% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 13
67% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 96%
Ek58gsa ZHGX 240G 240GB
148GB free
Firmware: S0312A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 195 131 71 70 69 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 471
Write 196
Mixed 248
SusWrite 121
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 100
4K Mixed 46.9
161% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 95.8
105% 177 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 85 87 87 87 86 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
48.3% Average
Read 83.3
Write 80.5
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 85
56% 75.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4DFS824A.C8FBD1 04CB 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 21.5
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.7
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.2
55% 73.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,506 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback