Today's hottest deals

HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6300 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 339A
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateMar 10 '23 at 21:17
Run Duration341 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 87.1
2-Core 142
64% 104 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 326
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 645
Nvidia(10DE 1029) 1GB
CLim: 823 MHz, MLim: 1000 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 474.14
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
8.85% Terrible
Lighting 9.9
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 12.6
8% 11.2 fps
MRender 14.2
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 11.1
10% 12.9 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.85%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microfrom 256GB SATA3 SSD 256GB
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0718B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 262 100 129 15 120 115 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
58.3% Above average
Read 462
Write 379
Mixed 359
SusWrite 124
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 35.6
4K Mixed 12.8
76% 25 MB/s
DQ Read 234
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 53.6
89% 172 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 94%
Seagate ST2000NM0011 2TB
587GB free
Firmware: NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 102 102 106 106 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 106
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 104
69% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
180% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 86%
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 89 95 96 95 92 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
53.5% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 80
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 93.6
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 55%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 120 129 147 132 136 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.8% Very good
Read 138
Write 163
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 130
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 0.9
415% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 77.8%
Great: 94%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 135 147 128 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 145
Write 108
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 134
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 6.6
4K Mixed 1
292% 3 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 87%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
720GB free
Firmware: 040B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 54.2
Write 25.2
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 9.2
21% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
269% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 93%
Seagate BUP Portable 5TB
541GB free
Firmware: 1707
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.1 9.3 9.4 8.9 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Read 50.2
Write 27.2
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 9.1
21% 28.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 69%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.7 8.6 8.5 8.8 8.6 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 55.7
Write 25
Mixed 24.5
SusWrite 8.6
32% 28.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.8
54% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 22%
WD Ext HDD 1021 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Read 53
Write 23.8
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 8.6
31% 27.3 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.9
59% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 22%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
464GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 93 106 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
39.5% Below average
Read 90.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 94.8
109% 81.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 42%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
987GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 5.4 2.2 0.5 2 0.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.9% Poor
Read 97.3
Write 97.4
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 2
64% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 20.9%
Great: 54%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 8.7 4.8 0.8 3 1.4 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.7% Poor
Read 147
Write 156
Mixed 32.7
SusWrite 3.4
102% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
102% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 54%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 92 105 95 96 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
40.5% Average
Read 123
Write 110
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 94.5
110% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.4
37% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 54%
ST316002 3AS 160GB
149GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 52 55 54 55 56 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39% Below average
Read 160
Write 14
Mixed 47.5
SusWrite 54.9
73% 69.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39%
Great: 39%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 55 53 55 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 119
Write 118
Mixed 73
SusWrite 54.5
118% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 1.2
181% 3.43 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 56%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
3.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.6 3.6 1.7 0.6 1.2 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 120
Write 119
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 1.5
96% 77.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.2
177% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.1% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 14.2
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6300 MT Builds (Compare 1,974 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6300 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback