Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics134% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory58.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime2.7 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 12:37
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Memory 54.5
1-Core 67.7
2-Core 133
49% 84.9 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 501
44% 376 Pts
64-Core 945
58% 945 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Asus(1043 88AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
134% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 220
Parallax 166
151% 190 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 134
Splatting 115
125% 159 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 134%
Great: 139%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3G37R5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 124 201 115 109 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77.3% Very good
Read 450
Write 372
Mixed 102
SusWrite 171
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 63.1
4K Mixed 33.8
115% 40.7 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 107
131% 231 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 92%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 162 160 162 162 161 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
23.2% Poor
Read 166
Write 153
Mixed 100
SusWrite 162
33% 145 MB/s
4K Read 10.9
4K Write 10.1
4K Mixed 1.1
23% 7.37 MB/s
DQ Read 1.6
DQ Write 13.3
DQ Mixed 1.6
3% 5.5 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.2%
Great: 39%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
347GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 81 80 81 81 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 121
Write 102
Mixed 71
SusWrite 80.3
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
195% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 86%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$77
344GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 83 83 84 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
55.6% Above average
Read 111
Write 110
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 82.4
71% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1
187% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-B 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 50.7
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 50.3
147% 51.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 145
28% 145 ns
Poor: 125%
This bench: 125%
Great: 179%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 9 60 27.5" 1280 720 SAM0C4E U28E590
Typical TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS Builds (Compare 864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 265%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 292%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING Z690-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $1,067
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback