Today's hottest deals

Google Compute Engine

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive25% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGoogle Compute Engine  (all builds)
MotherboardGoogle Google Compute Engine
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colors, 1216 x 744 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 17:35
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon Platinum 8481C
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 52.6
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 161
53% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 260
8-Core 500
45% 380 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 69%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
nvme_card-pd 54GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 109 109 102 118 141 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
25% Poor
Read 164
Write 164
Mixed 295
SusWrite 116
42% 185 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 8.9
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 14.6
DQ Mixed 14.6
12% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25%
Great: 29%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
142% Outstanding
MC Read 51.6
MC Write 83.1
MC Mixed 44.8
171% 59.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 11
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 142%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compute Engine Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

System: Google Compute Engine

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback